Spaced learning in a second language: a meta-analysis of 48 studies (Kim & Webb, 2022) | Lexy Blog

Spaced learning in a second language: a meta-analysis of 48 studies (Kim & Webb, 2022)

Sketch: a forgetting curve that each review returns to the top
Academic source

Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022).
The Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta-Analysis.
Language Learning, 72(2), 555–619.
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12487

Most classic memory-psychology studies used simple numbers, shapes or nonsense syllables in the participant's own language. Does the spacing effect hold up as strongly for a living second language (L2), with its grammar, phonetics and idiom to absorb?

In 2022 the journal Language Learning published a thorough answer: a meta-analysis by Su Kyung Kim and Stuart Webb.

The scale of the study: 48 papers, 3,411 learners

The researchers gathered and standardised data from every experimental study of spaced second-language practice published over the preceding decades. The final sample included:

  • 48 independent studies with control groups.
  • 98 individual effect sizes.
  • 3,411 participants of different ages learning second languages (English, Spanish, French, German and others).

The result: a weighted Hedges' g of 0.81 (p < .001). In social science statistics anything above 0.8 counts as a large effect. It means learners on a spaced schedule outperformed more than 79% of learners doing traditional massed practice.

"Spacing practice over time has a powerful, statistically robust and durable effect on second language acquisition. The effect stays exceptionally strong for both vocabulary and grammar." Kim & Webb, Language Learning (2022)

Key findings for language learners

Kim and Webb's analysis surfaced several details course designers usually miss:

  1. Delayed testing reveals the real gap: an immediate test right after the session shows little difference between groups. In delayed tests (after 7, 14, 30 days) the advantage of spacing grows geometrically.
  2. Audio and speech reinforcement: spaced repetition through listening and speaking held up better than visually rereading lists.
  3. Expanding intervals win: review after 1 day, then 3 days, then a week produces a more durable result than fixed, equal gaps.

How Kim & Webb (2022) shaped Lexy's audio library

This meta-analysis is the basis for the seven-stage structure of every Lexy lesson:

  • Stage 1 (Words): first exposure and an interactive quiz with pronunciation.
  • Stage 2 (Warm-up): a short written chat with Lexy: the same phrases in a new form before the voice lesson.
  • Stage 3 (Lesson with Lexy): a live voice conversation, the first act of spaced retrieval.
  • Stage 4 (Exercises): a varied check of the phrases five minutes after the dialogue.
  • Stage 5 (Dialogue between two native voices): hearing the topic again from outside, in new phrasing.
  • Stage 6 (Audio library and story): text to read and audio to relisten to at 2, 4 and 7 days, whenever you want.
  • Stage 7 (Memory flashcards): spaced review of previous lesson phrases from lesson 2 onward for durable retention.

A "Send to Telegram" button also puts the lesson's audio straight into your messages, so you can replay the conversation in headphones on the way to work the next day.

🎯 90-Second Quiz 1 / 5

Test Your Knowledge: Article Quiz

90-second quiz: check whether you understood the key themes of this article. 5 quick questions. If you make a mistake, we explain it right away.

1. How does spacing learning intervals affect second language acquisition?

Try the method a meta-analysis backs up

Feel the effect of spaced spoken practice for yourself. The first two lessons of any of Lexy's 49 languages are free — from foundational English to practical Spanish for travel.

Start lesson 1 free All blog articles